Background
The Supreme Court of India recently emphasized the need for inclusive infrastructure in court premises, particularly addressing the issue of separate toilets for men, women, persons with disabilities (PwD), and transgender persons. The bench, while hearing a case concerning judicial infrastructure, observed that the current state of facilities in courts across the country fails to meet the needs of all sections of society.
Issue of Inadequate Facilities
Many courts, especially in rural areas, lack basic amenities such as clean and accessible washrooms. This creates significant challenges for litigants, lawyers, and judicial staff, with women and transgender persons facing particular difficulties due to the absence of gender-sensitive facilities. The lack of accessible toilets also poses hurdles for PwD, contravening their right to equality and dignity under the law.
Supreme Court’s Observations
The bench pointed out that the judiciary must reflect inclusivity and accessibility, which are fundamental to a just legal system. It emphasized that separate washroom facilities for all genders and specially-abled persons are essential to ensure respect for their rights. The court also noted that providing such infrastructure is not just a matter of convenience but a constitutional obligation to uphold dignity and equality.
Directions Issued
The court directed the Union and state governments, along with judicial bodies, to conduct an audit of existing facilities and submit a roadmap for implementing gender-sensitive and disability-friendly toilets in court premises. It instructed that the designs of these facilities adhere to universal accessibility standards to ensure ease of use for PwD and senior citizens.
Challenges in Implementation
While the Supreme Court’s directive marks a significant step toward inclusivity, implementing the changes presents logistical and financial challenges. Many older court buildings may require structural modifications, and ensuring compliance with accessibility standards will involve considerable investment. However, experts agree that these measures are vital for creating a more inclusive judiciary.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s focus on inclusive infrastructure highlights the evolving understanding of equality within the judicial system. By addressing the needs of diverse groups, the judiciary aims to set an example for other public institutions. This directive, if effectively implemented, could improve access to justice and ensure dignity for all individuals who interact with the legal system.