The Bombay High Court has strongly criticized political parties for their disregard of court directives concerning illegal hoardings and banners across Maharashtra. The court emphasized the necessity for strict adherence to laws governing public spaces and expressed concern over the growing menace of unauthorized advertisements by political groups.
Background:
The matter was heard as part of a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking action against the rampant display of illegal hoardings, banners, and posters by political parties, often without obtaining requisite permissions. The PIL highlighted the defacement of public spaces and the threat such hoardings pose to public safety.
Despite previous orders by the High Court to curb the practice, political parties continued to flout regulations, prompting the court to issue strong remarks.
Key Arguments:
- Petitioners’ Stand:
- Political parties are habitual offenders in erecting illegal hoardings without any fear of consequences.
- The lack of enforcement by municipal authorities encourages such violations.
- Illegal hoardings obstruct public pathways, cause visual pollution, and create safety hazards.
- Respondents’ Stand:
- Municipal authorities argued that they regularly take action to remove illegal hoardings and impose fines.
- Political representatives claimed that banners are often put up by supporters without their consent or knowledge.
Court’s Observations:
The High Court noted:
- Political parties seem to have no respect for the rule of law or court orders concerning illegal hoardings.
- The inaction by municipal authorities appears to stem from political influence and a lack of accountability.
- Illegal hoardings are not only an eyesore but also a blatant violation of citizens’ rights to clean and obstruction-free public spaces.
The court further directed:
- Authorities to submit an action-taken report detailing steps to curb unauthorized hoardings.
- Strict penal action against violators, including lodging of FIRs and imposition of substantial fines.
- Political parties to educate their members and supporters about adhering to legal procedures.
Implications of the Judgment:
- Reinforcement of accountability for municipal authorities in maintaining public spaces.
- Heightened scrutiny of political parties to ensure compliance with court directives.
- Potential deterrent effect on the practice of putting up illegal hoardings.
Broader Context:
The issue of illegal hoardings is a recurring problem in India, with political parties often misusing public spaces for self-promotion. Despite judicial intervention, enforcement remains weak due to political interference and lack of stringent penalties.
Conclusion:
The Bombay High Court’s remarks underline the urgent need for political parties and authorities to uphold the rule of law. The judgment serves as a reminder that public spaces are not to be exploited for political gains, and violations will attract strict judicial scrutiny.